microCMS
microCMS
Domestic projects that only need a simple Japanese headless content API.
If GraphQL-free REST content alone is enough and you will not run agents against the backend, microCMS can stay.
LUNO vs microCMS →Contentful
Contentful
Enterprises standardized on Contentful’s content model and multi-language SDKs.
If Contentful is already the org standard and switching cost dominates, stay — unless agents must share the control plane.
LUNO vs Contentful →LUNO
Third option: LUNO
Category is AI-era Backend Platform. The question is not who wins CMS feature bingo — it is whether identity, forms, APIs, and agents share one record.
Japanese-capable teams that want MCP + forms + per-site/org platform pricing, not CMS-only APIs.
FAQ
FAQ
Should I pick microCMS or Contentful?
microCMS: Domestic projects that only need a simple Japanese headless content API. Contentful: Enterprises standardized on Contentful’s content model and multi-language SDKs.
Where does LUNO fit as a third option?
LUNO is not “another headless CMS winner” — it fits when you need a Backend Platform humans and agents share.
Where do I check pricing?
Vendor sites for A/B; LUNO on /pricing and /pricing.md.
Try the platform path
Evaluate MCP and forms on Free. Keep the CMS matrix open too.