Compare

LUNO is Backend Platform for the AI Era.

LUNO vs microCMS

microCMS is a Japan-first headless CMS with fast REST setup. LUNO is a Backend Platform: CMS-like content sits beside forms, identity, MCP agents, and edge ops under one control plane.

Why

Why people compare

Teams outgrow microCMS when they need agent operations, multi-tenant org surfaces, or more than REST content APIs.

Matrix

At a glance

DimensionLUNOmicroCMS
CategoryAI-era Backend PlatformCMS / headless CMS family
OperatorsHumans + agents (MCP)Editors + API/plugins
REST
GraphQLNot primary
Japanese UI
Pricing unitSite / org~$9+

Overview from public vendor info. Verify current details on each vendor site.

Who

Who each is for

  • LUNO

    Japanese-capable teams that want MCP + forms + per-site/org platform pricing, not CMS-only APIs.

  • microCMS

    Domestic projects that only need a simple Japanese headless content API.

  • When not to choose LUNO

    If GraphQL-free REST content alone is enough and you will not run agents against the backend, microCMS can stay.

Migrate

Migration posture

Model content on LUNO, move entries via API, reconnect Next/Nuxt clients, then enable MCP for ongoing edits.

FAQ

FAQ

  • Is LUNO just another Japanese headless CMS?

    No. Category is AI-era Backend Platform. Content is a capability; agents and forms share the same record.

  • Does LUNO have a free plan like microCMS Hobby?

    Yes — Free is $0/site forever for evaluation (MCP, embed, forms, public API). See /pricing.md.

  • Japanese UI?

    Yes. Console and docs support Japanese alongside English.

Start evaluating

Start on Free — no credit card. Details on Pricing.