Compare
LUNO is Backend Platform for the AI Era.
LUNO vs microCMS
microCMS is a Japan-first headless CMS with fast REST setup. LUNO is a Backend Platform: CMS-like content sits beside forms, identity, MCP agents, and edge ops under one control plane.
Why
Why people compare
Teams outgrow microCMS when they need agent operations, multi-tenant org surfaces, or more than REST content APIs.
Matrix
At a glance
| Dimension | LUNO | microCMS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI-era Backend Platform | CMS / headless CMS family |
| Operators | Humans + agents (MCP) | Editors + API/plugins |
| REST | ✓ | ✓ |
| GraphQL | Not primary | ✗ |
| Japanese UI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing unit | Site / org | ~$9+ |
Overview from public vendor info. Verify current details on each vendor site.
Who
Who each is for
LUNO
Japanese-capable teams that want MCP + forms + per-site/org platform pricing, not CMS-only APIs.
microCMS
Domestic projects that only need a simple Japanese headless content API.
When not to choose LUNO
If GraphQL-free REST content alone is enough and you will not run agents against the backend, microCMS can stay.
Migrate
Migration posture
Model content on LUNO, move entries via API, reconnect Next/Nuxt clients, then enable MCP for ongoing edits.
FAQ
FAQ
Is LUNO just another Japanese headless CMS?
No. Category is AI-era Backend Platform. Content is a capability; agents and forms share the same record.
Does LUNO have a free plan like microCMS Hobby?
Yes — Free is $0/site forever for evaluation (MCP, embed, forms, public API). See /pricing.md.
Japanese UI?
Yes. Console and docs support Japanese alongside English.
More
Related
- microCMS alternative →
- Comparison hub →
- microCMS official site →
- LUNO vs WordPress →
- LUNO vs Contentful →
- LUNO vs Strapi →
- LUNO vs Sanity →
- LUNO vs Hygraph →
https://luno.rest/en/vs/microcms