Compare
LUNO is Backend Platform for the AI Era.
LUNO vs Hygraph
Hygraph is GraphQL-native headless CMS. LUNO is REST/MCP-first Backend Platform — pick Hygraph for GraphQL content graphs; pick LUNO for agents + forms + platform ops.
Why
Why people compare
Teams leave when they need writable REST simplicity, agent keys, or non-GraphQL operator paths.
Matrix
At a glance
| Dimension | LUNO | Hygraph |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI-era Backend Platform | CMS / headless CMS family |
| Operators | Humans + agents (MCP) | Editors + API/plugins |
| REST | ✓ | ✗ |
| GraphQL | Not primary | ✓ |
| Japanese UI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Pricing unit | Site / org | ~$299+ |
Overview from public vendor info. Verify current details on each vendor site.
Who
Who each is for
LUNO
Agent-operated backends with forms and edge SaaS delivery.
Hygraph
GraphQL-first content graph teams.
When not to choose LUNO
If GraphQL-only is a hard requirement, prefer Hygraph.
Migrate
Migration posture
Translate GraphQL models to LUNO form sets/entries, rewire clients to REST/MCP.
FAQ
FAQ
Does LUNO require GraphQL?
No. REST and MCP are primary.
Can LUNO model complex content graphs?
Structured content and masters cover many cases; Hygraph still leads pure GraphQL graph UX.
Pricing posture?
LUNO publishes per-site/org USD pricing publicly on /pricing.md.
More
Related
- Hygraph alternative →
- Comparison hub →
- Hygraph official site →
- LUNO vs WordPress →
- LUNO vs microCMS →
- LUNO vs Contentful →
- LUNO vs Strapi →
- LUNO vs Sanity →
https://luno.rest/en/vs/hygraph